Insider trading, or “securities fraud,” is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 1348 and 15 U.S.C. § 10(b) As the Supreme Court explained in Dirks v. SEC, someone engages in insider trading under §10(b) if they breach a fiduciary duty by disclosing material, nonpublic information in exchange for a personal benefit. However, the Second Circuit’s recent holding in United States v. Blaszczak rejected this personal benefit requirement, at least as it relates to § 1348. The result? The range of conduct that triggers criminal liability under § 1348 is far bigger than the range of conduct that triggers liability under § 10(b). Stated another way, Blaszczak makes it easier for federal prosecutors to go after Title 18 securities fraud because – unlike Title 15 securities fraud – they do no need to prove the existence of a personal benefit.
Second Circuit Holds that Personal Benefit is Not Required for Insider Trading
Feb 7, 2020
Recent Posts
- Jayne Law Group is proud to announce that founding attorney Julia Jayne has become a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, one of the nation’s most prestigious legal member organizations.
- Julia M. Jayne Named Super Lawyer for the Thirteenth Year in a Row
- June 2023 – Jayne Law Group, a distinguished criminal defense law firm, proudly announces that its Founding Partner, Julia Jayne, has been honored as a ‘Legal Visionary’ in the esteemed Business of Law Magazine by the Los Angeles Times.
- June 2023 – Julia Jayne is named by the Los Angeles Business Journal’s 2023 Women’s Leadership Awards as a “Woman to Watch.”
- The Los Angeles Business Journal names Julia Jayne a Woman To Watch as part of the Women’s Leadership and Symposium Awards for 2023